Perioperative Management of the Patient with Liver Disease

Last Updated: September 12, 2001

Several good reviews are available in the literature on the perioperative management of patients with liver disease, and much of the research is based on retrospective analyses (Conn, 1991; Patel, 1999; Friedman, 1987; Friedman, 1999; Gholson, 1990). An estimated 1 in 700 patients admitted for elective surgery has abnormal liver chemistry tests (Conn, 1991). As many as 10% of patients with end-stage liver disease may have surgery during the last 2 years of their lives (Jackson, 1968).

The liver has a dual blood supply: portal-venous (75%) and hepatic-arterial (25%). It has significant functional reserve; hence, clinical manifestations of liver damage occur only after considerable injury. The liver is vital for the synthesis of proteins, glucose homeostasis, bilirubin excretion, and the removal of toxins, among other functions. Catecholamine response is impaired in patients with liver disease; therefore, intraoperative hypovolemia or hemorrhage may not trigger adequate compensatory mechanisms. Anesthetics causing sympathetic blockade further blunt this response. Hypoalbuminemia impairs drug binding and metabolism and causes elevated serum drug levels.

The treatment strategy for a patient with known liver disease depends on the etiology of the liver disease, the chronicity and histologic severity of the underlying liver disease, and the nature of the surgery. Intuitively, the more emergent the surgery, the less opportunity available to correct reversible factors such as electrolyte abnormalities, coagulopathy, and effects of portal hypertension (eg, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy). The presence of decompensated liver disease increases the risk of postoperative complications. Acute liver disease, such as viral hepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis, is associated with more ongoing hepatocyte damage than chronic liver disease, such as steatohepatitis. In general, patients with hepatitis likewise have higher morbidity rates than those with cholestatic disease. Patients with chronic liver disease, including conditions such as chronic hepatitis C, in whom liver function is preserved, may not have an increased operative risk (Friedman, 1999).

The extent of surgery and the type and severity of the liver disease play key roles in determining the specific risk. Other factors, as for any preoperative risk assessment (eg, cardiac disease, pulmonary gas exchange abnormalities, malnutrition), compound the risks of surgery in patients with liver disease.

According to a study published in 1963, laparotomy in patients with viral hepatitis carries a 10% mortality rate and a 12% morbidity rate, and this correlated with the extent of surgery (Harville, 1963). Little data exists on patients with chronic hepatitis, but patients with mild chronic hepatitis and well-preserved liver function tolerate surgery well, unlike patients with a higher risk, such as those with decompensated disease (Runyon, 1986).

In patients with alcoholic hepatitis, elective surgery is associated with high mortality unless the surgery is deferred until prolonged abstinence and biochemical and clinical progress is noted. Patients with cirrhosis have higher mortality rates postoperatively because of sepsis, bleeding, renal failure, and hepatic failure (decompensation of underlying liver disease). Patients with Child’s class B and Child’s class C cirrhosis have poorer outcomes when compared to those with Child's class A

The Child-Pugh score correlates with perioperative mortality in patients undergoing nonshunt surgery and in patients with cirrhosis who are undergoing abdominal procedures. According to a more recent analysis, serum albumin, leukocytosis, and an elevated prothrombin time are the most sensitive indicators of perioperative mortality independent of the Child-Pugh score (Garrison, 1984).

The scoring system for determining liver transplant necessity is based on the Child-Turcott-Pugh criteria. However, according to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) committee, this system is not designed to assess the probability of survival for patients with chronic liver disease in a nonsurgical situation. Rather, it is for patients undergoing surgical portocaval shunt or esophageal transection. Also, the system does not take into account the severity of any one clinical factor. For instance, a patient with a bilirubin level of 4 mg/dL and one with a bilirubin level of 20 mg/dL both get a score of 3, although the patient with the bilirubin level of 20 mg/dL has the greater chance of dying. The amount of ascites and degree of hepatic encephalopathy are altered easily by medical intervention, and this is not taken into account by the scoring system.

The Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) model, which uses serum creatinine, bilirubin, International Normalized Ratio, and disease etiology, may accurately predict patients who have a median survival of 3 months after an elective transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt (TIPS) procedure. This model is based on a heterogeneous group of patients from geographically diverse areas of the US. Elective abdominal surgical procedures should be avoided in potential candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Surgery in patients with aminopyrine breath test (ABT) results of less than 2.3% is associated with extremely high mortality. However, patients with cirrhosis who have normal ABTs tolerate elective surgery well (Gill, 1983). According to an analysis in one study, the presence of ascites in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a 37-83% mortality rate compared to an 11-53% mortality rate in those without ascites (Conn, 1991). Likewise, emergency surgery is associated with a 45-86% mortality rate, and preoperative infection is associated with a 64% mortality rate.

A bilirubin level of higher than 3 mg/dL, elevated creatinine, and hypoalbuminemia also are known to be associated with increased mortality (Runyon, 1986). The odds ratio for perioperative mortality in patients with liver disease who undergo cholecystectomy is 8.47. In fact, open cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis has been called a formidable operation, although more recent studies have reported lower, but still considerable, mortality in patients with cirrhosis who undergo abdominal surgery. However, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in selected patients who have well-compensated cirrhosis and no signs of portal hypertension (Friedman, 1999).

Cardiac surgery in patients with cirrhosis has been associated with a high operative mortality rate (Friedman, 1999). In patients with obstructive jaundice, other factors, such as a hematocrit of less than 30%, a serum bilirubin level of higher than 11 mg/dL, malignant biliary obstruction, azotemia, and cholangitis, are risk factors for operative mortality (Friedman, 1999).

The need for surgery for many conditions has decreased because of advances in imaging and because of improved nonsurgical techniques for managing problems such as extrahepatic biliary obstruction. TIPS has become the treatment of choice for managing refractory variceal bleeding in most instances, and surgical shunts are inserted only in special circumstances. Liver transplantation and hepatic surgery for a variety of causes have their own risks and often are necessary procedures. For example, in general, the anatomy of the liver precludes lobectomy in a bloodless fashion. Also, primary or secondary hepatic tumors may not produce changes in liver function, but postoperative factors can.

PREOPERATIVE FACTORS

Clinical

In evaluating the overall "health" of the liver, take into account the following:

 

  • History of exposure to hepatotoxic drugs (prescription, over-the-counter), toxins, or hepatotropic viruses

     

  • Stigmata of chronic liver disease (eg, gynecomastia, Dupuytren contracture, spider nevi, jaundice)

Be aware that patients with chronic liver disease can have aberrations in physiology which include the following:

 

  • Increased cardiac output

     

  • Decreased systemic vascular resistance

     

  • Hepatopulmonary syndrome

     

  • Tissue hypoperfusion resulting from shunting

     

  • Pulmonary hypertension

     

  • Ascites or hepatic hydrothorax causing restrictive disease

    Laboratory

    Routine liver chemistries are not indicated unless directed by the history and examination. The laboratory abnormalities listed below are common and should be screened for the following:

     

    • Electrolyte abnormalities - Hyponatremia (due to secondary hyperaldosteronism or fluid overload in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension), hypokalemia secondary to diuretic use, hypophosphatemia in patients with alcoholism

       

    • Coagulopathy - Synthetic defects causing prolongation of prothrombin time, other factor deficiencies resulting from liver disease

       

    • Thrombocytopenia resulting from portal hypertension and hypersplenism

       

    • Ascitic fluid analysis to rule out spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (if suggested by history and physical), serum-to-ascites albumin gradient to determine etiology

    Abnormalities of liver chemistry tests are nonspecific and may not always correlate with the extent of dysfunction. Tests of hepatic synthetic function include serum bilirubin and albumin levels and prothrombin time.

    Management

     

    In patients with autoimmune hepatitis or in other conditions where patients are on long-term prednisone, stress doses of hydrocortisone may be needed. Patients with hemochromatosis should be monitored for the development of diabetes and for preexistent cardiomyopathy.


  • INTRAOPERATIVE FACTORS

    Effects of anesthesia

    Most inhalation agents decrease hepatic blood flow. Fatal hepatic necrosis resulting from halothane is rare (1 case in 35,000), but severe liver dysfunction may occur in 1 case in 6000. Risk factors include multiple exposures, obesity, female sex, and middle age. This appears to be an immunosensitization process and can be inhibited by prior administration of disulfiram. Methoxyflurane and chloroform also should be avoided.

    Halogenated anesthetics (other than halothane) are not biotransformed in the liver; therefore, isoflurane is a safer choice because the effect on hepatic blood flow and oxygenation is much less than that of halothane. In fact, isoflurane increases hepatic arterial blood flow.

    Newer haloalkanes, such as sevoflurane and desflurane, undergo less hepatic metabolism than halothane or enflurane. Nitrous oxide is not hepatotoxic. Patients with cirrhosis have delayed clearance of drugs such as midazolam, fentanyl, and morphine. The half-life of lidocaine is increased by 300%, and the half-life of benzodiazepines is increased by 100%. Atracurium and doxacurium may be safer to use as muscle relaxants. A clinical pearl is to decrease the drug dosage by half and modify as needed (Conn, 1991).

    Effects of surgery

    Splanchnic traction and exploratory laparotomy can reduce blood flow to the intestines and the liver. Upper abdominal surgery is associated with the greatest reduction in hepatic blood flow. Elevation of liver chemistry tests is more likely to occur after biliary tract procedures than after nonabdominal procedures. Hypotension resulting in "shock liver injury" is possible. Hypercarbia causes decreased portal blood flow and must be avoided. An anesthesia-induced decrease in vascular resistance and hypotension can be responsible for this process. Universal precautions to prevent transmission of viral hepatitis and other diseases are important.

    Management

     

    •  Preoperative Factors

       

    • Use of volume replacement

       

    • Correction of coagulopathy

       

    • Management of ascites to maintain ventilation (ie, with diuretics and/or large-volume paracentesis)

    POSTOPERATIVE FACTORS

    In addition to the factors mentioned in previous sections, close monitoring of renal function is necessary, especially if fluid shifts have occurred. Renal failure worsens outcome, as is noted in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Meticulous hemostasis is necessary. Modify drug dosages based on liver function, and sedative and pain management should be titrated to prevent exacerbation of hepatic encephalopathy.

    The recovery of patients with intraoperative problems such as shock liver occurs with biochemical improvement in liver injury parameters (eg, lactic dehydrogenase, transaminases). The cause of acute liver disease after surgery may be multifactorial, but it may be the result of, especially, drug-induced problems, hypotension, blood loss, anesthetic-induced hepatitis, and intraoperative hepatic hypoxia.

    Postoperative jaundice may be caused by increased bilirubin resulting from infection, hemolysis, hematomas, and blood transfusion. The jaundice usually is self-limited and resolves spontaneously. Other causes include intrahepatic cholestasis and extrahepatic biliary obstruction (resulting from gallstones, strictures, and pancreatitis). Cholestatic jaundice increases the risk of postoperative renal failure. Preexisting liver disease may play a significant role in postoperative hepatic dysfunction.

    Management

    See Preoperative Factors and Intraoperative Factors. Manage ascites to prevent wound dehiscence and ventilatory problems. Patients with Wilson disease who are on D-penicillamine may have impaired wound healing; therefore, the dose should be decreased for the first 7-14 days postoperatively. Monitor patients for hypoglycemia. Monitor patients for signs of hepatic decompensation, such as jaundice, ascites, and encephalopathy, which may be triggered by postoperative constipation, bleeding, infection, or alkalosis. Treat spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Use imaging tests as necessary to assess intra-abdominal bleeding. Enteral or, rarely, parenteral nutrition may be necessary.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    • Conn M: Preoperative evaluation of the patient with liver disease. Mt Sinai J Med 1991 Jan; 58(1): 75-80[Medline].

    • Friedman LS, Maddrey WC: Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Med Clin North Am 1987 May; 71(3): 453-76[Medline].

    • Friedman LS: The risk of surgery in patients with liver disease. Hepatology 1999 Jun; 29(6): 1617-23[Medline].

    • Garrison RN, Cryer HM, Howard DA, Polk HC Jr: Clarification of risk factors for abdominal operations in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Ann Surg 1984 Jun; 199(6): 648-55[Medline].

    • Gholson CF, Provenza JM, Bacon BR: Hepatologic considerations in patients with parenchymal liver disease undergoing surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 1990 May; 85(5): 487-96[Medline].

    • Gill RA, Goodman MW, Golfus GR, et al: Aminopyrine breath test predicts surgical risk for patients with liver disease. Ann Surg 1983 Dec; 198(6): 701-4[Medline].

    • Harville DD, Summerskill WH: Surgery in acute hepatitis: causes and effects. JAMA 1963; 184: 257-61.

    • Jackson FC, Christophersen EB, Peternel WW, Kirimli B: Preoperative management of patients with liver disease. Surg Clin North Am 1968 Aug; 48(4): 907-30[Medline].

    • Patel T: Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1999 Jun; 74(6): 593-9[Medline].

    • Runyon BA: Surgical procedures are well tolerated by patients with asymptomatic chronic hepatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986 Oct; 8(5): 542-4

    • Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown RS Jr: Liver disease markedly increases the risk of perioperative death in cholecystectomy patients. Hepatology 1997; 26: 179A.

    Home page, Drug information's ,Regional anesthesia ,Index for  diseases ,Index for  diseases, Perioperative medicine, Search engine, Accreditation, Learn Arabic Warfare, Anesthesia LINKS, Orthopedic LINKS, Midline

    Constructed by Dr N.A. Nematallah Consultant in perioperative medicine and intensive therapy, Al Razi Orthopedic Hospital , State of Kuwait, email : razianesth@freeservers.com