Perioperative Cardiac Management

Last Updated: July 25, 2002

 

Physicians practicing medicine at the start of the 21st century are recognizing a patient population that is living longer and has an increase in the number and severity of comorbid illnesses. As a result, clinicians are often asked to evaluate the perioperative risk status of their patients.

The cardiovascular systems of patients who undergo general anesthesia and noncardiac surgical procedures are subject to multiple stresses and complications. A previously stable patient may decompensate postoperatively, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A substantial number of all deaths among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery result from cardiovascular complications.

Each year, approximately 30 million individuals in the United States undergo noncardiac surgery. Approximately one third have cardiac disease or major cardiac risk factors. Current estimated rates of serious perioperative cardiac morbidity vary from 1-10%. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) has increased 10- to 50-fold in patients who have had previous coronary events.

Cardiac risk stratification allows clinicians to group patients into various risk categories; therefore, low-risk patients can be spared further testing, whereas intermediate- and high-risk patients may undergo necessary investigations and treatment to reduce overall cardiac perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Cardiac effects of general anesthesia

The cardiovascular effects of general anesthesia include changes in the arterial and central venous pressures, cardiac output, and varying heart rhythms, which occur by the following mechanisms: decreased systemic vascular resistance, decreased myocardial contractility, decreased stroke volume, and increased myocardial irritability.

Induction of general anesthesia lowers systemic arterial pressures by 20-30%, tracheal intubation increases the blood pressure by 20-30 mm Hg, and agents such as nitrous oxide lower cardiac output by 15%.

The use of fentanyl, sufentanil, or alfentanil results in less myocardial depression compared to inhaled anesthetics. Yet, these intravenous agents still cause venodilation, thus reducing preload and hence, depressing cardiac output. Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) are particularly sensitive to these changes. By increasing the preoperative volume status and applying the Frank-Starling principle, one can offset this decrease in cardiac output. Additionally, inhalational and intravenous anesthetics along with muscle relaxants can be detrimental by sensitizing the myocardium to circulating catecholamines. As a result of the stress of the surgical procedure, circulating catecholamine levels are elevated, thereby increasing the risk of ventricular ectopy.

Cardiac effects of regional anesthesia

Both epidural and spinal anesthetics cause arteriodilation and venodilation by blocking sympathetic outflow, decreasing preload, and, ultimately, reducing cardiac output. To offset this deleterious effect, the clinician may volume load the patient preoperatively. However, this intervention increases the risk of postoperative CHF by 10-15%.

Although many clinicians believe that regional anesthesia is safer than general anesthesia, randomized studies comparing the 2 modalities have shown no difference in mortality or cardiopulmonary complications. Combined epidural and general anesthesia with analgesia for pain control may attenuate sympathetic hyperactivity, reduce the need for additional parenteral analgesia postoperatively, improve postoperative pulmonary function, and reduce the duration of stay in the intensive care unit following surgery.

PATIENT- AND PROCEDURE-RELATED FACTORS

Patient-related factors

Hypertension

Approximately 40% of patients who are aware they have hypertension are either not treated or inadequately treated with pharmacological therapy.

In the perioperative period, poorly controlled hypertension is associated with an increased incidence of ischemia, MI, left ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmia, and stroke. Patients with hypertension are at a higher risk for labile blood pressure and for hypertensive emergencies during surgery and immediately following extubation. Patients should continue taking antihypertensive medications throughout the perioperative period. The clinician should aim for a diastolic blood pressure lower than 100 mm Hg before proceeding with elective surgery. Intravenous esmolol, labetalol, or nitroprusside may be used for acute episodes of hypertension, whereas calcium channel blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may be used in less acute situations.

Congestive heart failure

The mortality rate following noncardiac surgery increases with worsening cardiac class and with the presence of pulmonary congestion. The perioperative mortality rate appears to be more dependent on the patient's condition at the time of surgery rather than on the myocardial depressant effects of the anesthesia. CHF should be aggressively and adequately treated before the patient undergoes major elective surgery. Therapy is aimed at reducing ventricular filling pressures in addition to improving cardiac output. Medications proven to show both a morbidity and mortality benefit include ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone. Digoxin and diuretics have been shown to improve morbidity rates without reducing mortality rates. Detsky et al suggest that patients with decompensated CHF should be stabilized for at least one week before undergoing elective surgery.

Ischemic heart disease

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality. During the 1970s, several studies reported a 30% risk of reinfarction or cardiac death for patients undergoing surgery within 3 months of an MI, 15% when surgery was performed 3-6 months after an infarction, and 5% when the operation was performed 6 months later.

True lifesaving procedures should be performed regardless of cardiac risk, but consideration should be given to performing elective surgery 6 months following an MI. In patients requiring semiurgent surgery, the patient's risk should be evaluated with prognostic studies (see Preoperative Risk Assessment). Shah et al revealed that 25% of patients with unstable angina had an MI after noncardiac procedures. Medical therapy and/or revascularization are necessary to ameliorate this risk factor.

Aortic stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a 13% risk of perioperative death. Risk varies based on the severity of AS. The death rate associated with critical AS is approximately 50%.

While taking a history, the clinician should inquire about symptoms of syncope, angina, and dyspnea. During the examination, assess for a crescendo-decrescendo murmur in the right intercostal space radiating to the carotids. Pulsus parvus et pulsus tardus, a soft second heart sound (S2), a late peaking murmur, brachioradial delay, and an apical-carotid delay should raise the suggestion of AS. Critical AS is often characterized by an absent S2 and pulsus parvus et tardus. An echo revealing an aortic valve area less than 1 cm2 and/or a gradient of 50 mm Hg is deemed critical stenosis. The clinician should delay surgery, except for emergencies, and should consider preoperative valve replacement in these selected patients.

Anticoagulation

The clinician must remember that patients with atrial fibrillation and prosthetic heart valves are on anticoagulation therapy. Coumadin therapy should be discontinued 4-5 days before elective surgery, given its half-life. Patients at high risk for thromboembolic events include those with prosthetic valves in the mitral position, atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease, and a history of thromboembolism. Such patients should be admitted for intravenous heparin treatment. Outpatient therapy with preoperative Lovenox instead of conventional unfractionated intravenous heparin is often used, although no randomized controlled trials have validated this protocol. Patients with highly thrombotic valves (eg, caged-balls), 2 prosthetic valves, or recent arterial embolism should be considered for standard intravenous heparin therapy perioperatively.

 

Procedure-related factors

The clinician must consider 2 factors when assessing the patient's cardiovascular risk: (1) the type of surgery and (2) the hemodynamic stress associated with the procedure. Generally, the more extensive the surgical procedure, the greater the physiological stress, the more significant the postoperative pain, and the greater the incidence of cardiac complications. Surgical operations may be classified as follows:

 

  • High-risk (>5% rate of perioperative death or MI) - Aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and prolonged procedures with large amounts of blood loss involving the abdomen, thorax, head, and neck

     

  • Intermediate-risk (1-5% rate of perioperative death or MI) - Urologic, orthopedic, and uncomplicated abdominal, head, neck, and thoracic operations

     

  • Low-risk (<1%) - Cataract removal, endoscopy, breast surgery

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Barash PG: Preoperative evaluation of the cardiac patient for noncardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 1991 May; 38(4 Pt 2): R134-44[Medline].
  • Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, et al: Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardi. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996 Mar 15; 27(4): 910-48[Medline].
  • Fleisher LA, Barash PG: Preoperative cardiac evaluation for noncardiac surgery: a functional approach. Anesth Analg 1992 Apr; 74(4): 586-98[Medline].
  • Gerson MC: Cardiac risk evaluation and management in noncardiac surgery. Clin Chest Med 1993 Jun; 14(2): 263-81[Medline].
  • Hollenberg SM: Preoperative cardiac risk assessment. Chest 1999 May; 115(5 Suppl): 51S-57S[Medline].
  • Krupski WC, Bensard DD: Preoperative cardiac risk management. Surg Clin North Am 1995 Aug; 75(4): 647-63[Medline].
  • Lemaire JB, Ghali W: How to estimate perioperative cardiac risk. Perspect Cardiol 1998; 51-9.
  • McCallion J, Krenis LJ: Preoperative cardiac evaluation. Am Fam Physician 1992 Apr; 45(4): 1723-32[Medline].
  • Palda VA, Detsky AS: Perioperative assessment and management of risk from coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1997 Aug 15; 127(4): 313-28[Medline].
  • Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al: The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999 Dec 9; 341(24): 1789-94[Medline].
  • Potyk D, Raudaskoski P: Preoperative cardiac evaluation for elective noncardiac surgery. Arch Fam Med 1998 Mar-Apr; 7(2): 164-73[Medline].

Home page, Drug information's ,Regional anesthesia ,Index for  diseases ,Index for  diseases, Perioperative medicine, Search engine, Accreditation, Learn Arabic Warfare, Anesthesia LINKS, Orthopedic LINKS, Midline

Constructed by Dr N.A. Nematallah Consultant in perioperative medicine and intensive therapy, Al Razi Orthopedic Hospital , State of Kuwait, email : razianesth@freeservers.com